DOSE-RESPONSE RELATIONSHIP IN OCCUPATIONAL NOISE EXPOSURES: THE DISTORTED QUANTIFICATION OF DOSE THAT MISINFORMS THE MEDICAL COMMUNITY

Autores

Paulo Sousa-Pereira
Faculdade de Engenharia, Universidade do Porto
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8105-2907
Huub H. C. Bakker
International Acoustics Research Organization
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5393-5115
Mariana Alves-Pereira
Universidade Lusófona
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3416-0630

Sinopse

Background: One of the foundational principles of Medical Sciences is the Dose-Response relationship. When occupational noise is measured, this corresponds to quantifying the Dose. In Portugal, noise is regulated by DL 9/2006 (RGR) which describes the methodologies to be used when quantifying noise levels. Objective: To demonstrate how RGRimposed methodologies are misleading the medical community as to the amount of Dose received and, consequently, compromising the investigation and evaluation of clinical Responses. Methods: High resolution noise measurements were continuously acquired during 7 days in a workplace. Data was analysed with RGR methodologies and compared to more modern and scientifically robust methodologies. Results: A total of 2022 10-minute recordings were collected, two of which were selected for presentation herein. As per the RGR-imposed methodologies, these two samples reflect similar acoustic environments since both exhibit an overall, audible noise level of 28 dBA. Physical reality, however, demonstrates that these two samples have significantly different acoustic environments, one of 89 dB and the other 47 dB. Conclusion:
The medical community is being misinformed by the RGR regarding the amount of Dose that workers receive. Consequently, the investigation into potential clinical Responses (health complaints) is frequently deemed (erroneously) to be unnecessary.

Downloads

Próximo

14 abril 2025

Licença

Creative Commons License

Este trabalho encontra-se publicado com a Licença Internacional Creative Commons Atribuição 4.0.